Bolden v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al
Terry Bolden |
Experian Information Solutions Inc and Equifax Information Services LLC |
1:2023cv06142 |
August 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Steven C Seeger |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the notice of settlement with Equifax (Dckt. No. #13 ) and with Experian (Dckt. No. #14 ). That's all the defendants. The parties expect to complete their settlement within 45 days. Given that reality, the compliant is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The dismissal shall automatically convert to a dismissal with prejudice unless a party seeks and obtains relief from the Court by December 15, 2023. The case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 14 Notice of Settlement by Terry Bolden as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Hussain, Syed) |
Filing 13 Notice of Settlement by Terry Bolden as to Equifax Information Services LLC (Hussain, Syed) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise plead (Dckt. No. #11 ) is hereby granted. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. shall respond to plaintiff's complaint by October 10, 2023. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) Modified on 9/18/2023 (jjr, ). |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead (Unopposed) (Lee, Andrew) |
Filing 10 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Experian Information Solutions Inc (Lee, Andrew) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc by Andrew Lee (Lee, Andrew) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendant's agreed motion for an extension of time to file responsive pleading (Dckt. No. #5 ) is hereby granted. Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall respond to plaintiff's complaint by October 9, 2023. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC by Kevin M. Hogan (Hogan, Kevin) |
Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Equifax Information Services LLC (Lewis, Rodney) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (unopposed) (Lewis, Rodney) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC by Rodney L. Lewis (Lewis, Rodney) |
Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by November 13, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Terry Bolden by Syed Haseeb Hussain (Hussain, Syed) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Terry Bolden; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20971136. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hussain, Syed) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mcp, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mcp, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc (jxm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.