Randall v. L'Oreal USA, Inc et al
| Leshell Randall |
| L'Oreal USA, Inc, L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC, Dabur International, LTD, Dabur International USA Ltd., Dabur USA Inc and Namaste Laboratories, LLC |
| 1:2023cv06283 |
| August 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( Randall v. L'Oreal USA, Inc et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (jh, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Leshell Randall by John C. Enochs (Enochs, John) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Leshell Randall by Betsy J. Barnes (Barnes, Betsy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Barnes, Betsy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Short Form Complaint filed by Leshell Randall; $2,000,000. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20975408.(Barnes, Betsy) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jcm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
