Gladden v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
| Rona Gladden |
| Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Luster Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC and Strength of Nature, LLC. |
| 1:2023cv06971 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 23-cv-06971 Gladden v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (daj, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rona Gladden by Michael Brandon Smith (Smith, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rona Gladden; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21003640.(Smith, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (mcp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
