Brown v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
| Patsy Brown |
| Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc, House of Cheatham LLC, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., LOreal USA Inc., Softsheen Carson, LLC, Luster Products, Inc.,, Namaste Laboratories, LLC, Revlon Consumer Prodcuts Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC., Revlon Inc and Strength of Nature, LLC. |
| 1:2023cv07136 |
| September 6, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Patsy Brown by Mark Abramowitz (Abramowitz, Mark) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-07136 Brown v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (nsf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Patsy Brown; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21009218. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Abramowitz, Mark) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (axa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
