Chaudhary et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Bhoomikaben P. Chaudhary and Vipulkumar R. Chaudhary |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 1:2023cv07325 |
| September 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Bhoomikaben P. Chaudhary, Vipulkumar R. Chaudhary by Christopher Michael Casazza (Casazza, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Press, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's status report. Status hearing is reset for 12/19/2023 at 9:45 a.m. (to track the case only; no appearance is required). The parties shall file a joint written status report by 12/12/2023. The court will enter a scheduling order in response to the status report. (Double entry of docket entry no. 4 with missing PDF). Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's status report. Status hearing is reset for 12/19/2023 at 9:45 a.m. (to track the case only; no appearance is required). The parties shall file a joint written status report by 12/12/2023. The court will enter a scheduling order in response to the status report. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
| Filing 3 STATUS Report for Plaintiff by Bhoomikaben P. Chaudhary, Vipulkumar R. Chaudhary (Casazza, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Status hearing set for 10/19/2023 at 9:45 a.m. (to track the case only; no appearance is required). Joint status report due 10/12/2023. The Court will enter an order based on the report. Mailed notice. (pmh) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (mek,) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mcp, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mcp, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Bhoomikaben P. Chaudhary, Vipulkumar R. Chaudhary; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21015323. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Casazza, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
