Lewis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
| Lawanda Lewis |
| AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC, LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc., Softsheen Carson, LLC, Luster Products, Inc.,, Namaste Laboratories, LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC., Revlon Inc and Strength of Nature, LLC |
| 1:2023cv07452 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lawanda Lewis by Mark Abramowitz (Abramowitz, Mark) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (smb, ) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-07452 Lewis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability (MDL 3060 ) (ksr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lawanda Lewis; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21016747. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Abramowitz, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
