Adams v. Loreal USA Products Inc. et al
| Fonda Adams |
| LOreal USA Products Inc., LOreal USA Inc., SoftSheen - Carson, LLC, Strength of Nature, LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Luster Products, Inc.,, AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., and AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv07638 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (emc, ) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-07638 Adams v. Loreal USA Products Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (nsf, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Fonda Adams by Jessica Glitz (Glitz, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Fonda Adams; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21020326. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Glitz, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
