Smith v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
Linda Smith |
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Soft-Sheen Carson LLC, SoftSheen-Carson, LLC, AFAM Concept Inc. administrator d/b/a JF Labs Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, Dabur International Ltd., Dabur International USA Ltd., Godrej Son Holdings Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, Luster Products, Inc., MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Namaste Laboratories, LLC, Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC and Strength of Nature Global, LLC |
1:2023cv08242 |
September 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Dabur International USA Ltd. (mek,) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (smb, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Linda Smith by Erica B. Slater (Slater, Erica) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Linda Smith by Anthony G. Simon (Simon, Anthony) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Linda Smith; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21031000. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Simon, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.