Lee v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
Theresa Lee |
Loreal USA, Inc, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen Carson, LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC, Revlon, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc, Namaste Laboratories, LLC, Dabur International, LTD, Dabur International USA, Ltd., HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc and Luster Products, Inc., |
1:2023cv08699 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (mek,) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-08699 Lee v. Loreal USA, Inc et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (ntf, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Theresa Lee by Chelsie L. Green (Green, Chelsie) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Green, Chelsie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Theresa Lee; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21035310.(Green, Chelsie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.