Owens v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
Anetra Owens |
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc., Parfums De Coeur, Ltd., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Strength of Nature, LLC, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC, Dabur International Ltd., Dabur International USA Ltd. and Namaste Laboratories LLC |
1:2023cv09469 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Parfums De Coeur, Ltd. (jcm) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anetra Owens by Andrew Daniel Bluth (Bluth, Andrew) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (ags) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-09469 Owens v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (ntf, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bluth, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anetra Owens; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21046295.(Bluth, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.