Roberts v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
| Kimberly Roberts |
| Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc., Parfums de Coeur, LTD. doing business as PDC Brands, L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Dabur International Ltd., Dabur International USA Ltd., Namaste Laboratories LLC, Avlon Industries, Chapman Products Co., Inc., AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc. and Phytochem USA Inc. |
| 1:2023cv09590 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kimberly Roberts by Andrew Daniel Bluth (Bluth, Andrew) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (vk) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bluth, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kimberly Roberts; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21047505.(Bluth, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
