Daniels v. Walmart, Inc.
| Najiya Daniels |
| Walmart, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv09599 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STATUS Report /JOINT STATUS REPORT by Walmart, Inc. (Mroueh, Yara) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Plaintiff to file a response to defendant's partial motion to dismiss #11 by 11/27/2023. Defendant to file a reply by 12/11/2023. Once the matter is fully briefed, the Court shall take it under advisement. As this Court's website directs, the parties must provide courtesy copies in hard copy form of all substantive and/or dispositive motions, including the corresponding legal briefs and attachments. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM by Walmart, Inc. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #11 /DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Mroueh, Yara) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Walmart, Inc. /DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Mroueh, Yara) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file its responsive pleading to plaintiff's complaint #9 is granted. Responsive pleading to be filed by 11/1/2023. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Walmart, Inc. for extension of time to File Its Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint (Unopposed) (Mroueh, Yara) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Walmart, Inc. by Yara Mroueh (Mroueh, Yara) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Walmart, Inc. by Michael A. Wilder (Wilder, Michael) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Najiya Daniels as to Walmart, Inc. on 9/20/2023, answer due 10/11/2023. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Status hearing is set for 11/13/2023 at 10:45 AM as an in-person hearing. Plaintiff(s) is directed to advise the defendant(s) of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. If the parties agree to consent jurisdiction before the Magistrate Judge, all parties must sign the consent form and electronically file the signed form on the case docket. The court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Walmart, Inc. (axa, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Najiya Daniels by Travis Phillip Lampert (Lampert, Travis) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Najiya Daniels by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Najiya Daniels; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21047691. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (axk, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (axk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Daniels v. Walmart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Najiya Daniels | |
| Represented By: | Travis Phillip Lampert |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Wilder |
| Represented By: | Yara Mroueh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
