Sullivan v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
| Janice Sullivan |
| Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., House of Cheatham, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Luster Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and Strength of Nature, LLC |
| 1:2023cv09823 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Janice Sullivan by Eviealle J. Dawkins (Dawkins, Eviealle) |
| MAILED Local Rule 83.16 to counsel for plaintiff. (jp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-09823 Sullivan v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Janice Sullivan; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21050592. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dawkins, Eviealle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
