Kleinberg v. Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") et al
Monisha Kleinberg |
Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), United Department of Labor ("DOL") and Better Business Bureau ("BBB") |
1:2023cv09888 |
September 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Matthew F Kennelly |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Telephonic status hearing held on 10/2/2023. Plaintiff failed to appear for the hearing. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The complaint is dismissed due to being unintelligible. Case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Telephonic status hearing held on 9/22/2023. Plaintiff failed to appear for the hearing as ordered. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution and for insufficiency of the complaint. Telephonic status hearing is reset to 10/2/2023 at 9:00 a.m. The following call-in number will be used for the hearing: 888-684-8852; access code 746-1053. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The Court has reviewed plaintiff's complaint in this case and needs to ask plaintiff a number of questions in order to clarify the nature of her claims. The Court sets the case for a telephonic hearing on 9/22/2023 at 9:00 AM for this purpose. The following call-in number will be used for the hearing: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff must call in at the scheduled time. If she does not do so then the Court may rule on the sufficiency of her claims without the benefit of her views. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ph, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Monisha Kleinberg for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ph, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Monisha Kleinberg. (ph, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Monisha Kleinberg. (ph, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ph, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.