Holland v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
Gayle Holland |
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc., Dabur International Ltd., Dabur International USA Ltd., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Strength of Nature, LLC and Dermoviva Skin Essentials, Inc. |
1:2023cv11531 |
September 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Real Property: Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (rp, ) |
Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-11531 Holland v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (emc, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gayle Holland by William F. Blankenship, III (Blankenship, William) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Blankenship, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gayle Holland; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21064237.(Blankenship, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.