Musillami v. Village of Romeoville
| Santino Musillami |
| Village of Romeoville |
| 1:2023cv12030 |
| September 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan B Gottschall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's deadline #13 to file a response to defendant's amended motion #11 to extend its deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint has come and gone, and nothing has been filed. Accordingly, defendant's amended motion #11 for an extension to and including 11/18/2023 of its deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is granted. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 10/18/23, 10/19/23, and a blank appearance form for pro se litigants to Plaintiff. (aee, ) Modified on 10/26/2023 (aee, ). |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Any response to defendant's amended motion #11 to extend its deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is due on or before 10/30/2023. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and a blank appearance form for pro se litigants upon plaintiff at the following address provided by defendant: Mr. Santino Anthony Musillami, Will County Adult Detention Center, 95 S. Chicago Street, Joliet, IL 60436. Plaintiff is advised that if he wishes to receive notice of future court filings, he must complete and file the enclosed appearance form for pro se litigants and tell the court where he wants notices sent. If plaintiff's address changes, he must file an updated appearance form for pro se litigants if he wishes to receive notices of court filings at his new address. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 12 STATUS Report Initial Status Report by Village of Romeoville (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Village of Romeoville for extension of time Defendant's Amended Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: The certificate of service accompanying defendant's motion #9 for a 30-day extension of its deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint states that the motion was emailed to plaintiff but lists no email address. The certificate also does not indicate that plaintiff has consented in writing to service by email, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E). Defendant's motion #9 is therefore denied without prejudice. Any refiled motion must include a certificate of service complying with Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Village of Romeoville for extension of time to file answer Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Village of Romeoville by Jaime D. Nolasco Esquivel (Nolasco Esquivel, Jaime) |
| Filing 7 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (aee, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (aee, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Defendant's motion #4 for an extension to and including 10/18/2023 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is granted. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: An initial status report is due on or before October 20, 2023. Counsel and parties are directed to familiarize themselves with the pretrial procedures in Judge Gottschall's case management packet, which is available from the court's website at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Please pay particular attention to the requirement to exchange initial disclosures within 14 days of the parties' initial discovery planning conference and the court's requirement that the parties are to explore settlement opportunities and identify areas of agreement prior to the filing of the first status report. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C) and 26(f)(2). If, by the due date of the scheduled status report, defendants have not been served, plaintiff should send an email to the chambers email account, chambers_gottschall@ilnd.uscourts.gov, to reset the status date. Counsel in cases removed from another court should follow these procedures to the extent applicable. See the order and Judge Gottschall's case management packet for further details. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 9/20/2023. Mailed notice (ags)
|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (nsf, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Defendant Village of Romeoville for extension of time to file answer or Otherwise Plead (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Village of Romeoville by Michael D. Bersani (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Will, case number (23 LA 545) filed by Village of Romeoville Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21068076. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bersani, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Musillami v. Village of Romeoville | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Santino Musillami | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Village of Romeoville | |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Bersani |
| Represented By: | Jaime D. Nolasco Esquivel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
