Pompey v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc et al
| Tammy Pompey |
| Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc, HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC, L Oreal USA, Inc., L Oreal USA, Products, Inc., NAMASTE LABORATORIES, LLC., REVLON, INC.,, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, SoftSheen- Carson LLC and Strength of Nature LLC |
| 1:2023cv12082 |
| September 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 23cv12082 Pompey v. Beauty Bell Enterprises et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (gcy, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tammy Pompey by Thomas Matthew Beh (Beh, Thomas) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (yt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tammy Pompey; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21068317. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Beh, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
