Manglona v. LOREAL USA Products, Inc. et al
| Marissa Manglona |
| LOREAL USA Products, Inc., LOreal USA Inc., Dabur International LTD USA Inc., Dabur International Ltd, Revlon Consumer Products Corp., Revlon, Inc., Revlon Group Holdings, LLC., SoftSheen - Carson, LLC and Strength of Nature, LLC |
| 1:2023cv12354 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marissa Manglona by Dimitri Dube (Dube, Dimitri) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marissa Manglona by Danae Nicole Benton (Benton, Danae) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (mcp, ) |
| Filing 3 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-12354 Manglona v. LOREAL USA Products, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (smb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marissa Manglona; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21069816. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Benton, Danae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
