Riccio v. Pfizer, Inc.
| Rose Riccio |
| Pfizer, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC |
| 1:2023cv13843 |
| September 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan B Gottschall |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Pfizer, Inc. (Bladow, Robyn) |
| Filing 18 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC (Bladow, Robyn) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Pfizer, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC by Robyn Eileen Bladow (Bladow, Robyn) |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose Riccio by Jonathan Marc Streisfeld (Streisfeld, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose Riccio by Kristen Lake Cardoso (Cardoso, Kristen) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose Riccio by Jeffrey M. Ostrow (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Counsel for defendant is instructed to file a notice of appearance and the notice of affiliates required by Local Rule 3.2 on or before 10/23/2023. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: The parties' joint motion #11 for leave to file an amended complaint and to enter a limited stay is granted. By request and agreement of the parties, this case is stayed pending the decision of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") on the motion to transfer in In re: Oral Phenylephrine Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 3089. Plaintiff has represented that she intends to file an amended complaint in this case. This order entering a stay does not preclude plaintiff from filing an amended complaint consistent with the representations made in the parties' joint motion #11 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). All outstanding deadlines, including the deadline of 11/29/2023 to file a joint initial status report, are stricken. As the parties have agreed, if the JPML does not transfer this case, the parties must advise this court by filing a status report within 14 days of the JPML's decision. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Rose Riccio to stay Joint Motion Regarding Plaintiff's Filing of an Amended Complaint and Stay pending Determination by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Weiner, Melissa) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rose Riccio as to Pfizer, Inc. on 9/25/2023, answer due 10/16/2023. (Klinger, Gary) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 9/22/2023. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: An initial status report is due on or before November 29, 2023. Counsel and parties are directed to familiarize themselves with the pretrial procedures in Judge Gottschall's case management packet, which is available from the court's website at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Please pay particular attention to the requirement to exchange initial disclosures within 14 days of the parties' initial discovery planning conference and the court's requirement that the parties are to explore settlement opportunities and identify areas of agreement prior to the filing of the first status report. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C) and 26(f)(2). If, by the due date of the scheduled status report, defendants have not been served, plaintiff should send an email to the chambers email account, chambers_gottschall@ilnd.uscourts.gov, to reset the status date. Counsel in cases removed from another court should follow these procedures to the extent applicable. See the order and Judge Gottschall's case management packet for further details. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Pfizer, Inc. (mek) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose Riccio by Ryan Thomas Gott (Gott, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose Riccio by Melissa Susan Weiner (Weiner, Melissa) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mek, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mek,) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose Riccio by Erin J. Ruben (Ruben, Erin) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose Riccio by John Hunter Bryson (Bryson, John) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose Riccio by Nick Suciu, III (Suciu, Nick) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rose Riccio; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21100598.(Klinger, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
