Muniz v. Cicero Food Mart, Inc.
Brian Muniz |
Cicero Food Mart, Inc. |
1:2023cv13990 |
September 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Plaintiff's renewed in forma pauperis application #14 is complete and is granted in light of financial indigency. The previously set schedule is in place. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 14 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Brian Muniz for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Corrected (Johnson, Ryan) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: (1.) On review of the Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #5 , the Plaintiff answered "yes" to Question 4 (cash in a bank account) but did not list how much is in the account. The Plaintiff shall file a complete renewed application by 11/20/2023. (2.) Although the complaint has not formally been filed, the agreed extension motion to respond to the complaint #11 is granted to 12/22/2023. On 12/22/2023, the parties also shall file the joint initial status report. (3.) To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a tracking status hearing is set for 12/01/2023 at 8:30 a.m. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
Filing 12 Notice of Motion for Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead NOTICE of Motion by Christopher R. Parker for presentment of extension of time #11 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/14/2023 at 08:30 AM. (Parker, Christopher) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Cicero Food Mart, Inc. for extension of time Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Parker, Christopher) |
Filing 10 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Cicero Food Mart, Inc. Defendant's Notification of Affiliates (Parker, Christopher) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cicero Food Mart, Inc. by Christopher R. Parker (Parker, Christopher) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cicero Food Mart, Inc. by Margaret Anne Gisch (Gisch, Margaret) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Muniz as to Cicero Food Mart, Inc. on 10/4/2023, answer due 10/25/2023. (Johnson, Ryan) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Cicero Food Mart, Inc. (jcm) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brian Muniz by Jordan David Greenberg (Greenberg, Jordan) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Brian Muniz for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Johnson, Ryan) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brian Muniz by Ryan D Johnson (Johnson, Ryan) |
Filing 3 ORDER: #Local Rule 3.3# requires that any document submitted for filing for which a filing fee is required must be accompanied either by the appropriate fee or an In Forma Pauperis Application and Financial Affidavit. No filing fee or IFP petition was submitted at the time of filing this matter. Brian Muniz is directed to pay the required filing fee or submit a completed #In Forma Pauperis Application and Financial Affidavit# within 15 days of this notification. Pursuant to LR 3.3(f), failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of the action by the assigned judge. Signed by the Executive Committee. (evw, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Johnson, Ryan) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Brian Muniz; (Johnson, Ryan) Modified on 10/2/2023 (aee, ). |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (evw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Muniz v. Cicero Food Mart, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brian Muniz | |
Represented By: | Jordan David Greenberg |
Represented By: | Ryan D Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cicero Food Mart, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Margaret Anne Gisch |
Represented By: | Christopher R. Parker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.