Brooks v. State of Illinois et al
| Ostranda Brooks |
| State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections and Raymond |
| 1:2023cv14094 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED order dated 10/3/2023 #5 to Trust Fund Officer at Illinois Correctional Center. (jn, ) |
| EMAILED order dated 10/3/2023 #5 to the Court's Fiscal Department. (jn, ) |
| MAILED Order dated 10/3/2023 to the Plaintiff. (jh, ) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Ostranda Brooks to reason to continue. (Envelope postmarked 10/10/2023) (daj, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to immediately deduct $15.73 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to (1) send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Illinois River Correctional Center and to the Court's Fiscal Department. However, summonses shall not issue at this time. Plaintiff is given until November 2, 2023, to show cause (explain in writing) why his complaint should not be dismissed as time barred. Failure to do so by this date will result in the matter being dismissed with prejudice as time barred. Plaintiff is reminded that he has the responsibility to timely inform the Court of any change of address and failure to do so may result in the matter being dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with Court orders. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/3/2023. Mailed notice. (kp, )
|
| MAILED a copy of this order #5 to the trust fund officer at Illinois River Correctional Center and to the Court's Fiscal Department. (kp, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent form to Ostranda Brooks. (jn, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Ostranda Brooks for attorney representation. (Exhibit). (jn, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ostranda Brooks for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Ostranda Brooks. (Exhibit). (Envelope postmark 9/18/2023). (jn, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jn, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
