Givens v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
| LaDawn Givens |
| Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund |
| 1:2023cv14101 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 794 Rehabilitation Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AMENDED complaint by LaDawn Givens against All Defendants (Spearman, Kendra) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion to file an amended complaint #4 is granted. Plaintiff may file the amended complaint instanter as a separate entry on the docket. Defendant's response to the amended complaint is due 1/9/24, and the parties' joint initial status report is now due 1/12/24. (mss) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff LaDawn Givens to amend/correct Complaint (Spearman, Kendra) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 11/28/23, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff LaDawn Givens by Kendra Danielle Spearman (Spearman, Kendra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by LaDawn Givens; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21144017. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spearman, Kendra) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Givens v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LaDawn Givens | |
| Represented By: | Kendra Danielle Spearman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
