Ramirez v. Balif Remodeling, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Josue Enemias Santos Ramirez
Defendant: Balif Remodeling, LLC and Giorgian Stanciu
Case Number: 1:2023cv14294
Filed: September 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Durkin
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Josue Enemias Santos Ramirez as to Giorgian Stanciu. (Schlade, Daniel)
October 26, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Josue Enemias Santos Ramirez as to Balif Remodeling, LLC. (Schlade, Daniel)
October 2, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Balif Remodeling, LLC, Giorgian Stanciu (axk, )
September 29, 2023 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Josue Enemias Santos Ramirez by Daniel I Schlade (Schlade, Daniel)
September 29, 2023 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Josue Enemias Santos Ramirez by James Dore (Dore, James)
September 29, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Josue Enemias Santos Ramirez by James Richard Mata (Mata, James)
September 29, 2023 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mata, James)
September 29, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mata, James)
September 29, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Josue Enemias Santos Ramirez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21164807. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Mata, James)
September 29, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (axa, )
September 29, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (axa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez v. Balif Remodeling, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Josue Enemias Santos Ramirez
Represented By: Daniel I Schlade
Represented By: James Dore
Represented By: James Richard Mata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Balif Remodeling, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Giorgian Stanciu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?