Patel et al v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Mukeshbhai Patel and Manishaben Patel
Defendant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Merrick Garland, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Connie Nolan
Case Number: 1:2023cv14340
Filed: September 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2023 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The Court has reviewed the parties' joint status report. The telephonic status hearing set for 11/27/2023 is vacated and reset to 1/9/2024 at 9:05 AM, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. A further joint status report is to be filed on 1/2/2024. (mk)
November 20, 2023 Filing 10 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Manishaben Patel, Mukeshbhai Patel (Green, Brian)
October 31, 2023 Filing 9 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Press, Joshua)
October 31, 2023 Filing 8 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Oswald, Craig)
October 25, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mukeshbhai Patel, Manishaben Patel as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 10/23/2023, answer due 12/22/2023 (Green, Brian)
October 25, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mukeshbhai Patel, Manishaben Patel as to Connie Nolan served on 10/23/2023, answer due 12/22/2023 (Green, Brian)
October 25, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mukeshbhai Patel, Manishaben Patel as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 10/20/2023, answer due 12/19/2023 (Green, Brian)
October 25, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mukeshbhai Patel, Manishaben Patel as to Ur M. Jaddou served on 10/24/2023, answer due 12/25/2023 (Green, Brian)
October 25, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mukeshbhai Patel, Manishaben Patel as to Merrick Garland served on 10/20/2023, answer due 12/19/2023 (Green, Brian)
October 22, 2023 Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: By no later than 11/20/2023, the parties (or, if no defendant has yet appeared, the plaintiff(s)) are to file a joint status report that includes the following information: (1) the status of service of process upon each defendant; (2) a description of each party's claims and defenses; (3) details regarding any discussions concerning settlement, whether before or after the filing of the lawsuit; (4) a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule; and (5) any other matters that any party wishes to bring to the Court's attention. The case is set for a case management conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 on 11/27/2023 at 9:10 a.m. The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide a copy of this order to any defendant that has not yet appeared by counsel via regular mail at the address at which the defendant has been or is to be served with process. (mk)
October 3, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (mek,)
October 2, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (mcp, )
October 2, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mcp, )
September 29, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and Declaratory and Injunctive Relief filed by Mukeshbhai Patel, Manishaben Patel; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21168874. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Green, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patel et al v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mukeshbhai Patel
Represented By: Brian Scott Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manishaben Patel
Represented By: Brian Scott Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Connie Nolan
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?