APS Group, Inc. v. Supplybit LLC
Plaintiff: APS Group, Inc.
Defendant: Supplybit LLC and Supplybit, LLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv14378
Filed: October 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mary M Rowland
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2023 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by Supplybit, LLC(Pendleton, Ashley)
November 7, 2023 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant's unopposed motion to extend deadline to file answer or responsive pleading #11 is granted. The deadline to answer or otherwise plead is extended to November 10, 2023. Mailed notice. (dm, )
November 6, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Supplybit, LLC for extension of time to file answer (Pendleton, Ashley)
November 3, 2023 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Supplybit, LLC by Ashley Dorrian Pendleton (Pendleton, Ashley)
November 3, 2023 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Supplybit, LLC by James Edward Griffith (Griffith, James)
November 3, 2023 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Supplybit, LLC by Ryan S. Zeller (Zeller, Ryan)
October 25, 2023 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff having established #6 , at least for pleading purposes, that there is complete diversity, Plaintiff has complied with this Court's order #5 requiring a jurisdictional supplement as to subject matter jurisdiction. Joint initial status report remains due 12/15/23. Mailed notice. (dm, )
October 18, 2023 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to Jurisdictional statement (Zhao, Gary)
October 16, 2023 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: In light of Plaintiff's invocation of diversity jurisdiction as the basis for federal jurisdiction, on or before 11/3/23, Plaintiff shall file a jurisdictional supplement, as a separate docket entry. Plaintiff is reminded that a corporation is a citizen of its state of incorporation and the state where it maintains its principal place of business. Qin v. Deslongchamps, 31 F.4th 576, 579 (7th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, Plaintiff must inform the Court where it maintains its principal place of business. Failure to file the supplement as directed may result in remand of this case for lack of jurisdiction. Joint initial status report remains due 12/15/23. Mailed notice. (dm, )
October 10, 2023 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 12/15/23, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )
October 9, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff APS Group, Inc. proof of service (Zhao, Gary)
October 3, 2023 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff APS Group, Inc. by Gary Zhao (Zhao, Gary)
October 3, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (axk, )
October 3, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (axk, )
October 3, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Supplybit LLC (jxm, )
October 2, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by APS Group, Inc.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21174507. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zhao, Gary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: APS Group, Inc. v. Supplybit LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: APS Group, Inc.
Represented By: Gary Zhao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Supplybit LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Supplybit, LLC
Represented By: James Edward Griffith
Represented By: Ashley Dorrian Pendleton
Represented By: Ryan S. Zeller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?