Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC v. Bennett
| Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC |
| David Bennett |
| 1:2023cv14386 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Nancy L Maldonado |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by James William Lecompte, III on behalf of Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC regarding notification of affiliates pursuant to local rule 3.2 #5 , affidavit of service #4 (Lecompte, James) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC (Lecompte, James) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC regarding Summons and Complaint served on David Bennett on 10/13/2023 (Lecompte, James) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: A Rule 16 initial status hearing is set for 12/20/23 at 10:00 a.m. in person in Courtroom 1925. By 12/13/23 the parties shall file a joint Initial Status Report that complies with the Court's standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. (ca, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant David Bennett (jxm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (axk, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (axk, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC by James William Lecompte, III (Lecompte, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21175366. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lecompte, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC v. Bennett | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC | |
| Represented By: | James William Lecompte, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Bennett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
