Carter v. AFAM Concept, Inc, et al
Terresa Terry Carter |
Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, AFAM Concept, Inc, doing business as JF Labs, Inc, Avlon Industries, Inc., House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham, LLC., Loreal USA, Inc, Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Luster Products Company, Namaste Laboratories, Strength of Nature, LLC and Godrej SON Holdings, Inc |
1:2023cv14393 |
October 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category 2). (axk, ) |
Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-14393 Carter v. AFAM Concept, Inc, et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (jb, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Terresa Terry Carter by Michael Brandon Smith (Smith, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Terresa Terry Carter; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21176522.(Smith, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.