Tate v. Hughes et al
| James Tate |
| Latoya Hughes, Melvin Hinton, John Doe, L Lindgren, Brittni Roldan, LCSW, QMHP and Cathy McClure |
| 1:2023cv14494 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Subsequent to the transfer of this case, Plaintiff submitted a motion consenting to proceed before a magistrate judge #12 . Any requested relief is denied without prejudice to assertion in the transferred case, Tate v. Hughes, 23-cv-3493 (S.D. Ill.). All further filings should be made in that court. This case remains closed. (rao, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff James Tate Notice and to consent to proceed before a magistrate judge. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(lw, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for status #9 is granted to the extent that Plaintiff is informed that his case has been transferred to the Southern District of Illinois, where it is case number 3:23-cv-3493. All further filings should be made in that Court. This case remains closed. (rao, ) |
| Filing 10 TRANSFERRED to the USDC Southern District of Illinois, East St. Louis Div. the electronic record. (jn, ) |
| ELECTRONIC Acknowledgement of case transferred to the Southern District of Illinois as case 3:23-cv-03493, filed 10/25/2023. (ph, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff James Tate for status quo. (daj, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER: The Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer this action forthwith to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, East St. Louis Division, for review of Plaintiff's initial pleadings and any other action deemed appropriate. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 10/18/2023. Mailed notice. (jn, )
|
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent form to James Tate. (jn, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff James Tate. (jn, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff James Tate for attorney representation. (jn, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff James Tate for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by James Tate. (Envelope postmark 9/28/2023). (jn, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
