Marshall vs. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
| Mary Marshall |
| AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc., Avlon Industries Inc, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC, L Oreal USA Products, Inc., L Oreal USA, Inc., Luster Products, Inc., NAMASTE LABORATORIES, LLC., REVLON, INC.,, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, SoftSheen - Carson, LLC and Strength of Nature LLC |
| 1:2023cv14554 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mary Marshall by Thomas Matthew Beh (Beh, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-14554 Marshall vs. AFAM Concept Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (ksr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mary Marshall; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21192393. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Beh, Thomas) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (mek,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
