Phillips-DeVane v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
Helen Phillips-DeVane |
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC,, Loreal USA Products Inc, Loreal USA Inc, MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, Revlon Inc, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, SoftSheen - Carson, LLC and Strength of Nature LLC |
1:2023cv14600 |
October 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Helen Phillips-DeVane by Thomas Matthew Beh (Beh, Thomas) |
Filing 3 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-14600 Phillips-DeVane v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (ksr, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Beh, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Helen Phillips-DeVane; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21197941.(Beh, Thomas) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category Direct). (gmm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.