Winburn v. Atlas Express Courier, Inc. et al
Destiny Winburn |
Atlas Express Courier, Inc. and Fred Scott |
1:2023cv14680 |
October 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sharon Johnson Coleman |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Due to the Court's trial calendar, the in-person status hearing set for 12/11/2023 is stricken and reset to 1/5/2024 at 10:30 AM. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. Mailed notice. (ym) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Destiny Winburn as to Fred Scott on 11/21/2023, answer due 12/12/2023. (Eisenback, Chad) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Destiny Winburn as to Atlas Express Courier, Inc. on 11/21/2023, answer due 12/12/2023. (Eisenback, Chad) |
Filing 6 STATUS Report by Destiny Winburn (Eisenback, Chad) |
ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendants Atlas Express Courier, Inc., Fred Scott. (jxm, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Atlas Express Courier, Inc., Fred Scott (jxm, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Status hearing is set for 12/11/2023 at 9:00 AM as an in-person hearing. Plaintiff(s) is directed to advise the defendant(s) of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. If the parties agree to consent jurisdiction before the Magistrate Judge, all parties must sign the consent form and electronically file the signed form on the case docket. The court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Destiny Winburn by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Destiny Winburn by Chad William Eisenback (Eisenback, Chad) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Eisenback, Chad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Destiny Winburn; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21201917.(Eisenback, Chad) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (smb, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.