Lawson v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
| Robin Lawson |
| AFAM Concept Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products Inc, Luster Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, Revlon, Inc., Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, SoftSheen - Carson, LLC and Strength of Nature LLC |
| 1:2023cv14731 |
| October 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robin Lawson by Thomas Matthew Beh (Beh, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-14731 Lawson v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (ksr, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Beh, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robin Lawson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21208359.(Beh, Thomas) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category 2). (axa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
