Ivy et al v. Bank of America
| Edicott Ivy and Sheri Smith |
| Bank of America |
| 1:2023cv14764 |
| October 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss #14 is due by January 8, 2024. Defendant's reply is due by January 22, 2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 16 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Bank of America and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 (Adkins, Tammy) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM by Bank of America in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #14 (Adkins, Tammy) |
| Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Bank of America (Adkins, Tammy) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Bank of America by Tammy L. Adkins (Adkins, Tammy) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edicott Ivy, Sheri Smith as to Bank of America on 11/10/2023, answer due 12/1/2023. (ph, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Bank of America (evw, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. Plaintiff is directed to complete a summons form for the Defendant and return it to the Clerks' Office at 219. S. Dearborn, 20th Floor, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, for issuance. The Clerk is instructed to issue summons for service of the complaint. Once summons for Defendant issues, Plaintiff is reminded of Plaintiff's obligation to complete service on each Defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Plaintiff is notified that if a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court must dismiss the action without prejudice. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:In person initial status hearing set for 1/10/2024 at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 2119. Initial Status Report shall be filed by 1/5/2024. The report should comply with the requirements set forth in the Initial Status Report standing order, which can be found at Judge Jenkins's web page @ (http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov, "District Judges", to "Judge Lindsay Jenkins", to "Initial Status Hearings" under Case Management Procedures"). The parties must follow all the standing orders for Judge Jenkins and all Local Rules, which can be found at the same web page. At the Initial Status hearing, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; and (3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. If you need to appear virtually, contact Judge Jenkins' courtroom deputy at least three business days in advance of the hearing to make the request. The courtroom deputy will inform you as to whether your request has been approved. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 9 COMPLAINT filed by Edicott Ivy, Sheri Smith; Jury Demand. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff Ivy's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #5 is denied without prejudice to refiling at a later time. The application indicates that Plaintiff is employed and makes a few thousand dollars per month, so it is not appropriate to waive the fee. Plaintiff must pay the $402 filing fee by November 9, 2023 or the case will be dismissed without prejudice. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 6 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins for all further proceedings. Honorable Joan H. Lefkow no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/17/2023. (ags) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent form to Edicott M. Ivy. (jn, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Edicott Ivy for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jn, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Sheri Smith. (jn, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Edicott Ivy. (jn, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Edicott Ivy. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
