Randolph Butler v. AFAM Concept Inc., et al
| Francis Randolph Butler |
| AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham, LLC., LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc., Luster Products Company, McBride Research Laboratories, Namaste Laboratories, SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Strength of Nature, LLC, Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, AFAM Concept Inc. doing business as JF Labs Inc. and House of Cheatham, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv15069 |
| October 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category 2). (mcp, ) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; (1:23-cv-15069 Randolph Butler v. AFAM Concept Inc., et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060). (rc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Francis Randolph Butler; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21231495. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Benton, Danae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
