Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 1:2023cv15075 |
| October 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal, this action is dismissed with prejudice. All pending dates before this court are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Walsh, Patrick) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third party subpoena prior to a rule 26(f) conference #5 is granted. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Patrick Joseph Walsh on behalf of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Walsh, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Walsh, Patrick) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC for discovery (Walsh, Patrick) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mcp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (mcp, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Walsh, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC by Patrick Joseph Walsh (Walsh, Patrick) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Walsh, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21231793. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Walsh, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Joseph Walsh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
