Conn v. Experian Information Solutions et al
| Tamika Conn |
| Experian Information Solutions, Equifax Informations Services, TransUnion LLC and PNC Bank N.A. |
| 1:2023cv15087 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| M David Weisman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: Magistrate status hearing held. Pro se plaintiff appeared in person. Defense counsel appeared in person. Case referred for discovery management and settlement. Court inquired about settlement conference. Defense counsel stated demands have been made by plaintiff but believe settlement conference is premature. Defendants to issue written discovery by 1/8/24. Plaintiff can use defendants' discovery requests as a model; plaintiff's discovery requests to be issued by 1/29/24. A joint status report shall be filed by 3/7/24. Status hearing set for 3/12/24 at 9:15 a.m. Plaintiff shall email the courtroom deputy, Ms. Owens, and copy defense counsel with alternative dates if the 3/12/24 date does not work for plaintiff. Parties may appear at the next status hearing by telephone, if desired. Court will set close of fact discovery at next status hearing, so parties shall be prepared to inform the Court as to how much discovery they will need. Court inquired about protective order. Any motion for protective order (Court requests one protective order for the case) shall be filed 12/21/23 and should include a statement as to whether it is agreed. The proposed order should be based on the Form LR 26.2 Model Confidentiality Order, and the parties must submit a clean copy of their proposed order, along with a corresponding redlined copy of the Court's model order, to the Court's proposed order email address: Proposed_Order_Weisman@ilnd.uscourts.gov. If the proposed order is acceptable to the Court, it will be entered. Parties may appear in person or dial in using the Court's conference call-in number. The conference call-in number is 1-877-411-9748 and the passcode is 1814539. Please note that the Court's conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the Court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called by the Court. Once the Court has heard your case you shall disconnect from the conference line. Members of the public and media who wish to listen to this hearing may call in. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (ao, ) |
| Filing 25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant TransUnion LLC by Sydney O. Burden (Burden, Sydney) |
| Filing 24 STATUS Report (Joint Initial) by TransUnion LLC Presented before Magistrate Judge (Poling, Colin) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to Complaint by Experian Information Solutions(Ralph, Mitchell) |
| Filing 22 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant TransUnion LLC by Colin C. Poling (Poling, Colin) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Notice of Affirmative and Other Defenses by PNC Bank N.A.(Newton, Amelia) |
| Filing 20 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant PNC Bank N.A. by Amelia Susan Newton (Newton, Amelia) |
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Weisman for discovery supervision and scheduling, to set a deadline to file amended pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement. Initial status hearing scheduled for 12/6/23 at 9:15 a.m. Prior to the status hearing, the Court directs counsel to consult the Court's standing order. Joint status report due on 12/4/23 setting forth a proposed written discovery schedule, whether the parties are interested in an early settlement conference, and any other issues the parties wish to raise. Mailed notice (ao, ) |
| Filing 18 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable M. David Weisman for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision and scheduling, to set a deadline to file amended pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement. (rao, ) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Informations Services by Kevin M. Hogan (Hogan, Kevin) |
| Filing 16 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Equifax Informations Services (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Equifax Informations Services(Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Informations Services by Rodney L. Lewis (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by TransUnion LLC(Brady, Scott) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #11 is granted. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 11/29/2023. The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 12/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Outline for the Initial Joint Status Report) (rao, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Experian Information Solutions for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 UNOPPOSED (Ralph, Mitchell) |
| Filing 10 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Experian Information Solutions (Ralph, Mitchell) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Experian Information Solutions by Mitchell Hughes Ralph (Ralph, Mitchell) |
| Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by TransUnion LLC (Rang, Laura) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant TransUnion LLC by Laura K. Rang (Rang, Laura) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant TransUnion LLC by Scott Edwin Brady (Brady, Scott) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (nsf, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Equifax Informations Services, Experian Information Solutions, PNC Bank N.A., TransUnion LLC (nsf, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Tamika Conn. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tamika Conn. (nsf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
