Olagunju v. L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. et al
| Alice Olagunju |
| L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., Dabur International Ltd., Dabur International USA Ltd., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, Luster Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Strength of Nature, LLC and SoftSheen * Carson (W.I.), Inc. |
| 1:2023cv15133 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 23cv15133 Olagunju v. L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. et al Direct file in ILND). In Re: In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (gcy, ) Modified on 10/23/2023 (gcy, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Alice Olagunju; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21238565. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garcia, EricaRae) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category Direct). (mek,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
