Hanna v. Internal Revenue Service et al
| Edward Hanna |
| Internal Revenue Service, Saradha Venkatraman and Dorothy Smith |
| 1:2023cv15238 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Edward Hanna. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (nsf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Edward Hanna. (Exhibits) (nsf, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/24/2023: #1 Notice of Filing) (nsf, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
