Padilla v. Bocknak et al
Plaintiff: Alan Padilla
Defendant: Bocknak, Harris, Hernandez and Vanellis
Case Number: 1:2023cv15307
Filed: October 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2023 SUMMONS Issued to the U.S. Marshal Service via email as to Defendants Bocknak, Harris, Hernandez. (jh, )
December 19, 2023 EMAILED Order dated 12/18/2023 #5 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at Cook County Jail and to the Court's Fiscal Department. (jh, )
December 19, 2023 MAILED three blank USM-285 (Marshals service) forms, filing instructions, and a copy of Order dated 12/18/2023 to the Plaintiff. (jh, )
December 18, 2023 Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Alan Padilla. (Exhibits) (jh, )
December 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court authorizes and orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $58.60 from his account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. Plaintiff may move forward on his complaint #1 . However, his claim concerning a mishandled grievance is dismissed on threshold review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. The Court directs the Clerk to: (1) terminate CRW Vanellis as a Defendant; (2) issue summonses for service of the complaint on Defendants Bocknak, Harris, and Hernandez; (3) mail Plaintiff three blank USM-285 (Marshals service) forms, filing instructions, and a copy of this order; and (4) forward copies of this order to the Court's Fiscal Department and to Plaintiff's trust account officer. Plaintiff must return the completed USM-285 forms by January 22, 2024. The Marshals Service will not attempt service without the completed forms, and if Plaintiff does not return the forms by the deadline, this case may be dismissed for want of prosecution and failure to comply with a court order. If Plaintiff moves, he must promptly submit a change-of-address notification. If Plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of his address, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with a court order and for failure to prosecute. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 12/18/2023. Mailed notice (jh, )
December 11, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE by Alan Padilla of Change of Address. (Envelope postmark 12/5/2023). (jn, )
October 27, 2023 MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent form to Alan Padilla. (jn, )
October 27, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, )
October 25, 2023 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Alan Padilla for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits). (jn, )
October 25, 2023 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, )
October 25, 2023 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Alan Padilla. (Exhibit). (Envelope postmark 10/18/2023). (jn, )
October 25, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category Direct). (jn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Padilla v. Bocknak et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alan Padilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bocknak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?