Shezbie v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
| Cynthia Shezbie |
| Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, AFAM Concept Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc, Avlon Industries, House of Cheatham Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc, House of Cheatham LLC, LOreal USA Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Luster Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and Strength of Nature, LLC |
| 1:2023cv15390 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-15390 Shezbie v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (ksr, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cynthia Shezbie by Michael Brandon Smith (Smith, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Cynthia Shezbie; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21269368.(Smith, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category 2). (axa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
