Botes v. MAR CHI-V, LLC, d/b/a Volkswagen of Downtown Chicago
Plaintiff: Shaun Botes
Defendant: MAR CHI-V, LLC, d/b/a Volkswagen of Downtown Chicago
Case Number: 1:2023cv15474
Filed: October 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John J Tharp
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2023 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Upon receipt of the plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal #6 and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this matter is concluded. All deadlines are stricken, and any pending motions are denied as moot. Civil Case Terminated. Mailed notice (air, )
November 16, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shaun Botes (Edelman, Daniel)
October 31, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant MAR CHI-V, LLC, d/b/a Volkswagen of Downtown Chicago (jcc, )
October 30, 2023 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shaun Botes by Stephen J Pigozzi (Pigozzi, Stephen)
October 30, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shaun Botes by Tara Leigh Goodwin (Goodwin, Tara)
October 30, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shaun Botes by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel)
October 30, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Edelman, Daniel)
October 30, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Shaun Botes; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21277969. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)(Edelman, Daniel)
October 30, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, )
October 30, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (evw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Botes v. MAR CHI-V, LLC, d/b/a Volkswagen of Downtown Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaun Botes
Represented By: Tara Leigh Goodwin
Represented By: Stephen J Pigozzi
Represented By: Daniel A. Edelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAR CHI-V, LLC, d/b/a Volkswagen of Downtown Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?