Roberts-Seliger v. Burger King Corporation et al
| Alice Roberts-Seliger |
| Burger King Corporation, Burger King Company LLC and Burger King Holdings, Inc |
| 1:2023cv15477 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/28/2023: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alice Roberts-Seliger as to Burger King Corporation on 11/14/2023, answer due 12/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Lynch, James) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alice Roberts-Seliger as to Burger King Company LLC on 11/14/2023, answer due 12/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Lynch, James) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED complaint by Alice Roberts-Seliger against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing Notice of Filing, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F)(Lynch, James) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Burger King Company LLC, Burger King Corporation (evw, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Upon review of the complaint, the Court makes the following jurisdictional inquiry. Plaintiff premises jurisdiction on the diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1332. Plaintiff alleges that both Burger King Corporation and Burger King Company LLC's citizenship for diversity jurisdiction is their respective place of incorporation and principal place of business. R. 1 4-9. But an LLC's citizenship is not like a corporation's; instead an LLC is a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. Wise v. Wachovia Securities, LLC, 450 F.3d 265, 267 (7th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, on or before 11/15/2023, Plaintiff should either file an amended complaint fixing these problems as to Defendant Burger King Company LLC's citizenship, or otherwise file a memorandum explaining why the current complaint sufficiently alleges jurisdiction. Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 01/16/2024 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Emailed notice (axc). |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jxm, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Alice Roberts-Seliger by James P. Lynch (Lynch, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lynch, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT at Law filed by Alice Roberts-Seliger; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21278206.(Lynch, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
