Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Parlor Sports, Inc. et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Parlor Sports, Inc., d/b/a Prestige Sports Bar, f/k/a Parlor Sports Bar, Fayez Dahleh, Parlor Sports, Inc. doing business as Prestige Sports Bar formerly known as Parlor Sports Bar and Parlor Sports Bar |
| 1:2023cv16003 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. as to Parlor Sports, Inc. on 12/1/2023, answer due 12/22/2023. (Yoon, Yeoeun) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 8, the Plaintiff says that the corporate Defendant was served on 12/01/2023. The Plaintiff shall file the return of service by 01/18/2024. For the individual Defendant, the Rule 4(m) period has around 35 days remaining. The tracking status hearing of 01/12/2024 is reset to 02/09/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report (or the Plaintiff shall file it) by 02/02/2024. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 8 STATUS Report -- Initial Status Report by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. (Yoon, Yeoeun) |
| Filing 7 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/28/2023: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 01/12/2024 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 01/04/2024. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang for all further proceedings. Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo no longer assigned to the case pursuant to 28USC294(b). Signed by Executive Committee on 11/21/2023. (td, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Fayez Dahleh, Parlor Sports, Inc., d/b/a Prestige Sports Bar, f/k/a Parlor Sports Bar (gmm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (axk, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (axk, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. -- Corporate Disclosure Statement (Yoon, Yeoeun) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. by Yeoeun Yoon (Yoon, Yeoeun) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Yoon, Yeoeun) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21335566. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Yoon, Yeoeun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
