Richardson v. Johnson and Johnson et al
| Jamie Lamont Richardson |
| Johnson and Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceutical's Company |
| 1:2023cv16064 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED order dated 1/2/2024 #5 and an amended complaint form with instructions to Jamie Lamont Richardson. (jn, ) |
| EMAILED order dated 1/2/2024 #5 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at Cook County Jail and Court's Fiscal Department. (jn, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 1/2/2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court defers ruling on Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 until Plaintiff complies with this order. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to immediately deduct $1.93 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order (electronically if possible) to the trust fund officer at the facility having custody of Plaintiff and to the court's fiscal department. Summonses, however, shall not issue on Plaintiff's complaint #1 , which is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is given until February 2, 2024, to (1) submit an amended complaint and (2) show cause in writing why his action should not be dismissed as untimely. Failure to comply in full with both of these directives will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. Alternatively, Plaintiff may attempt to refile his claims in state court. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff an amended complaint form and instructions along with a copy of this order. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent form to Jamie Lamont Richardson. (jn, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Jamie Lamont Richardson for attorney representation. (jn, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Jamie Lamont Richardson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Jamie Lamont Richardson. (Envelope postmark 11/9/2023). (jn, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
