Moore v. Will County Adult Detention Facility et al
| Ce'Andre D. Moore |
| Will County Adult Detention Facility, David J. Adams, Will County and City of Joliet |
| 1:2023cv16207 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED Order dated 1/2/2024 to the trust fund officer at the facility having custody of Plaintiff and to the Court's Fiscal Department. (jh, ) |
| MAILED Order dated 1/2/2024, a blank amended complaint form, and instructions to the Plaintiff. (jh, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to immediately deduct $8.16 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order (electronically if possible) to the trust fund officer at the facility having custody of Plaintiff and to the Court's Fiscal Department. Summons, however, shall not issue. Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must submit an amended complaint in accordance with this order. Failure to submit an amended complaint by January 23, 2024, will result in dismissal of this lawsuit. Plaintiff also is advised that he must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. If Plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of his address, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with a Court order and for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff an amended complaint form and instructions along with a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/2/2024. Mailed notice (jh, )
|
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Ce'Andre D. Moore. (jh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ce'Andre D. Moore for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Ce'Andre D. Moore. (Received for Docketing on 11/27/2023) (Envelope not Postmarked) (jh, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Direct assignment.. (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
