Berry v. City Colleges of Chicago
Plaintiff: Marion Berry
Defendant: City Colleges of Chicago
Case Number: 1:2023cv16670
Filed: December 12, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sara L Ellis
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2024 Filing 14 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by City Colleges of Chicago(Thomas, James)
February 7, 2024 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marion Berry by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed)
February 6, 2024 Filing 12 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Marion Berry (Eisenback, Chad)
February 5, 2024 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants Defendant's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #8 . Defendant's responsive pleading is due by 2/9/2024. Mailed notice. (kp, )
January 26, 2024 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Colleges of Chicago by Elliot Richard Slowiczek (Slowiczek, Elliot)
January 26, 2024 Filing 9 Defendant's NOTICE of Motion by James Daniel Thomas for presentment of extension of time #8 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 2/6/2024 at 09:45 AM. (Thomas, James)
January 26, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant City Colleges of Chicago for extension of time Defendant's First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Thomas, James)
January 26, 2024 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Colleges of Chicago by James Daniel Thomas (Thomas, James)
January 7, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marion Berry as to City Colleges of Chicago on 1/5/2024, answer due 1/26/2024. (Badwan, Mohammed)
December 29, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant City Colleges of Chicago (mek)
December 28, 2023 Filing 5 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/28/2023: Mailed notice. (tg, )
December 13, 2023 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial telephonic status conference in this matter is set for 2/13/2024 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' website and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 2/6/2024. Mailed notice (rj, )
December 12, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marion Berry by Chad William Eisenback (Eisenback, Chad)
December 12, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Eisenback, Chad)
December 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marion Berry ; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21413138. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Eisenback, Chad)
December 12, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, )
December 12, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (evw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry v. City Colleges of Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marion Berry
Represented By: Chad William Eisenback
Represented By: Mohammed Omar Badwan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Colleges of Chicago
Represented By: James Daniel Thomas
Represented By: Elliot Richard Slowiczek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?