Maldonado v. Target Corporation
| Grabiela Maldonado |
| Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores |
| 1:2023cv16941 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Having reviewed the parties' 2/9/24 status report #13 , the Court sets initial case management dates as follows: Defendant shall respond to the complaint by 2/23/24, and the parties shall exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by 2/29/24, issue written discovery by 3/29/24, amend their pleadings (to add claims, parties, etc.) by 5/31/24, and complete all fact discovery by 8/29/24. The parties shall file an updated status report by 9/10/24 confirming that fact discovery is complete and indicating definitively whether either side will require expert discovery or seek summary judgment. The Court encourages the parties to continue their settlement discussions and to exhaust all possibility of settlement before spending time and money on expert discovery and dispositive motions. To this end, Plaintiff shall make a final, written demand by 8/30/24, Defendant shall respond by 9/4/24, and the parties shall confirm compliance in their 9/10/24 status report. If at any time the parties agree that a settlement conference with the assigned Magistrate Judge could be productive, they should call chambers to so advise. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 13 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Grabiela Maldonado (Lampert, Travis) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #11 is granted and any answer shall be filed on or before 2/23/2024. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Target Corporation for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead/Unopposed (Palivos, Maria) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Target Corporation by Maria Anna Palivos (Palivos, Maria) |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Target Corporation (Bednarek, Lucy) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Target Corporation by Lucy B. Bednarek (Bednarek, Lucy) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Grabiela Maldonado as to Target Corporation on 1/5/2024, answer due 1/26/2024. (Lampert, Travis) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been reassigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 2/9/2024, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, at Gloria_Lewis@ilnd.uscourts.gov. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Target Corporation (lm, ) |
| Filing 5 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/28/2023: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jxm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Grabiela Maldonado by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Grabiela Maldonado by Travis Phillip Lampert (Lampert, Travis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lampert, Travis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Grabiela Maldonado; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21440809. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Lampert, Travis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maldonado v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Grabiela Maldonado | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Represented By: | Travis Phillip Lampert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores | |
| Represented By: | Lucy B. Bednarek |
| Represented By: | Maria Anna Palivos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
