Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. v. MRX Holdings LLC et al
Plaintiff: Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant: MRX Holdings LLC doing business as Match Rx, MatchRxChange, LLC doing business as Match Rx and John Does 1-10
Case Number: 1:2023cv16993
Filed: December 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Robert W Gettleman
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. by Dulijaza Clark (Clark, Dulijaza)
December 21, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel)
December 21, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Edelman, Daniel)
December 21, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION filed by Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21449181. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Edelman, Daniel)
December 21, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (jxm, )
December 21, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, )
December 21, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants MRX Holdings LLC, MatchRxChange, LLC (mcp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. v. MRX Holdings LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc.
Represented By: Dulijaza Clark
Represented By: Daniel A. Edelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MRX Holdings LLC doing business as Match Rx
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MatchRxChange, LLC doing business as Match Rx
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?