Kotevski v. Clinton et al
| Milan Michael Kotevski |
| Hillary Rodham Clinton and William Jefferson Clinton |
| 1:2023cv17137 |
| December 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. Β§ 1331 Federal Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 45 CERTIFIED copy of order dated 2/12/2024 from the 7th Circuit regarding notice of appeal; Appellate case no.: 24-1085; In light of the district court's judgment dated January 26, 2024, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's motions are DENIED as unnecessary. (jj, ) |
| Filing 44 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: On January 26, 2024, the Court closed this case because Plaintiff had failed to pay the filing fee or reapply for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). [ #40 , #41 ] Plaintiff moves to vacate that order #43 . His motion is denied. Plaintiff acknowledges that he did not comply with the Court's fee order but says this was "because it was a fraudulent decision." [Id. ΒΆ 27.] He is welcome to make that argument on appeal, but the Court declines to revisit its order. It also does not address any of Plaintiff's other arguments because the dismissal was only because of Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 43 MOTION F.R.C.P. Rule 60(b) by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski to vacate court's ruling to dismiss the case in 23cv17137. (rc, ) |
| Filing 42 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/26/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 41 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 1/26/2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 40 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court denied Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") #3 without prejudice and instructed him to pay the filing fee or reapply for IFP status by January 22, 2024. As of today, Plaintiff has not done so, though he has filed several other motions and letters since the Court requested that he resolve the filing fee. To the extent that Plaintiff's pending mandamus petition in the Seventh Circuit, Appeal No. 24-1085, may impact this Court's jurisdiction, the Court certifies that the mandamus action is frivolous. Cf. Apostol v. Callion, 870 F.2d 1335, 1339 (7th Cir. 1989) ("[A] notice of appeal may be so baseless that it does not invoke appellate jurisdiction."). Mandamus is only appropriate when, among other conditions, "the challenged order is not effectively reviewable at the end of the case." Abelesz v. Erste Grp. Bank AG, 695 F.3d 655, 662 (7th Cir. 2012). The orders Plaintiff challenges, dismissal of a complaint, denial of IFP status, and denial of a motion, are routinely reviewed on appeal, so his mandamus petition does not divest this Court of jurisdiction. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. All pending motions are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 39 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/25/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 38 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/25/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 37 REVOCATION by Milan Michael Kotevski of the Case Being Under Seal as of 01/27/2024. (Exhibits). (jj, ) |
| Filing 36 F.R.C.P RULE 60(b) MOTION by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski to Vacate Court's Motion Denying Judge Jenkins' Recusal in 23CV17137. (jj, ) |
Filing 34
ORDER written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 1/23/2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Main Document 34 replaced on 1/24/2024) (jlj, ).
|
| Filing 33 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion to disqualify the judge #28 is denied. See attached order for details. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 35 CONDITIONAL 28 U.S.C. 1404 MOTION by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski for Removal of both 23CV17137 and Plaintiff's Writ of Mandamus and Permanent Injunction in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeal For Malicious, Wanton, and Extreme Prejudice to Plaintiff to the Middle District ofLouisiana and/or to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals respectively. (jj, ) |
| Filing 32 CIRCUIT Rule 3(b) Fee Notice. (jj, ) |
| Filing 31 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of short record on appeal regarding notice of appeal 1/19/2024; USCA Case No. 24-1085. (jj, ) |
| Filing 30 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/21/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 29 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/20/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: On January 17, 2024, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion for entry of default #20 in part because the Clerk cannot enter a default given the relief Plaintiff seeks and because Plaintiff has not yet resolved the issue of the filing fee #25 . The Court is now in receipt of Plaintiff's January 16, 2024 motion in support of his motion for entry of default, which was not entered onto the docket until today, January 18, 2024 #26 . The motion is denied as moot because the underlying motion has been denied. Further, to the extent that it is a freestanding motion, it is denied because the Court will not grant any form of relief until Plaintiff has paid the filing fee or been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court's January 17 order explained that Plaintiff should not file duplicate motions; similarly, Plaintiff should not re-file motions with additional arguments. Litigants are expected to make their arguments in a single filing and should not submit follow-ups with first seeking the Court's permission to do so. The Court realizes Plaintiff filed his most recent motion before the Court issued its January 17 order, so it does not fault him for his January 16 filing. Going forward, however, the Court will not entertain arguments presented in duplicative filings unless the filings explain why Plaintiff could not have made those arguments at the time of his initial filing. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 1/17/2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
| Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for entry of default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) #20 and for relief from the January 9, 2024 Order under Rule 60(b)(1) #21 are both denied. See attached Order for further detail. The duplicative motions filed at #22 , #23 are both terminated as moot. The deadlines and instructions stated in the Court's previous Order stand. Kotevski is reminded that if he does not pay the filing fee or reapply for in forma pauperis status by January 22, 2024, the Court will dismiss his case, and that if he does not submit an amended complaint by February 5, 2024 that in good faith attempts to comply with the Rules and the Court's instructions, the case will be dismissed.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 26 MOTION by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski in support of plaintiff's for entry of default against DEFENDANTS HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, SAMUEL ALITO, HAROLD HONGJU KOH, BOEING, AT&T, APPLE, VERIZON, MICROSOFT, META, ROBERT MUELLER III, JOHN O. BRENNAN, JEH JOHNSON, JANET NAPOLITANO, the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CIA, FBI, NSA, the GOVERNMENT OF RUSSIA, the GOVERNMENT OF CHINA, the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, the GOVERNMENT of INDIA, the GOVERNMENT of JAPAN, the GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY, the GOVERNMENT of QATAR (and as full or part owners and managers of DEFENDANTS QIA, LONDON HEATHROW AIRPORT HOLDINGS, and QATAR AIRWAYS), UNITED AIRLINES, DELTA AIRLINES, LUFTHANSA, SPICEJET, DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, NEW ORLEANS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, ATLANTA HARTFIELD JACKSON AIRPORT, and any and all American, British, Indian, German, Japanese, Russian, Chinese, and Qatari governmental agencies and departments listed in the Complaint. (jj, ) |
| Filing 23 FRCP RULE 60(b)(1) MOTION by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski. (ph, ) |
| Filing 22 MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTS HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, SAMUEL ALITO, HAROLD HONGJU KOH, BOEING, AT&T, APPLE, VERIZON, MICROSOFT, META, ROBERT MUELLER III, JOHN O. BRENNAN, JEH JOHNSON, JANET NAPOLITANO, the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CIA, FBI, NSA, the GOVERNMENT OF RUSSIA, the GOVERNMENT OF CHINA, the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, the GOVERNMENT of INDIA, the GOVERNMENT of JAPAN, the GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY, the GOVERNMENT of QATAR (and as full or part owners and managers of DEFENDANTS QIA, LONDON HEATHROW AIRPORT HOLDINGS, and QATAR AIRWAYS), UNITED AIRLINES, DELTA AIRLINES, LUFTHANSA, SPICEJET, DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, NEW ORLEANS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, ATLANTA HARTFIELD JACKSON AIRPORT, and any and all American, British, Indian, German, Japanese, Russian, Chinese, and Qatari governmental agencies and departments listed in the Complaint by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski. (ph, ) |
| Filing 21 FRCP RULE 60(b)(1) MOTION by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski. (ph, ) |
| Filing 20 MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTS HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, SAMUEL ALITO, HAROLD HONGJU KOH, BOEING, AT&T, APPLE, VERIZON, MICROSOFT, META, ROBERT MUELLER III, JOHN O. BRENNAN, JEH JOHNSON, JANET NAPOLITANO, the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CIA, FBI, NSA, the GOVERNMENT OF RUSSIA, the GOVERNMENT OF CHINA, the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, the GOVERNMENT of INDIA, the GOVERNMENT of JAPAN, the GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY, the GOVERNMENT of QATAR (and as full or part owners and managers of DEFENDANTS QIA, LONDON HEATHROW AIRPORT HOLDINGS, and QATAR AIRWAYS), UNITED AIRLINES, DELTA AIRLINES, LUFTHANSA, SPICEJET, DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, NEW ORLEANS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, ATLANTA HARTFIELD JACKSON AIRPORT, and any and all American, British, Indian, German, Japanese, Russian, Chinese, and Qatari governmental agencies and departments listed in the Complaint by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski. (ph, ) |
| Filing 19 LETTER from Miki Kotevski dated 1/13/2024. (ph, ) |
| Filing 18 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/10/2024. (jj, ) Modified on 1/12/2024. (jj, ). |
| Filing 28 MOTION by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski to disqualify judge. (jj, ) |
| Filing 17 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/10/2024. (jj, ) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 1/9/2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff Kotevski's Complaint [Dkt. #1 ] is stricken for failure to comply with Rules 8 and 10. Kotevski has until February 5, 2024 to file an amended complaint. Kotevski's application to proceed IFP [Dkt. #3 ] is denied without prejudice. By January 22, 2024, he must either pay the filing fee or reapply for IFP status. The motion to recruit counsel [Dkt. #4 ] is denied without prejudice. See order for further detail. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 14 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/08/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 13 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/07/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 12 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/07/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 11 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/06/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 10 LETTER from Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/06/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 9 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/04/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 8 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/03/2024. (jj, ) |
| Filing 7 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins for all further proceedings. Honorable Thomas M. Durkin no longer assigned to the case pursuant to 28 USC 294(b). Signed by Executive Committee on 1/2/2024. (jn, ) |
| Filing 6 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/2/2024. (jn, ) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from Milan Michael Kotevski dated 1/2/2024. (jn, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent form to Milan Michael Kotevski. (jn, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski for attorney representation. (jn, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jn, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Milan Michael Kotevski. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). v (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
