Agha v. Uber Technologies lnc
| Mazen Hasan Agha, Michael Crissman, Ken Zurek and Thomas Loftus |
| Uber Technologies lnc |
| 1:2023cv17182 |
| December 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Uber Technologies lnc (May, Taylor)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Telephonic status hearing held on 2/12/2024. Any motion to compel arbitration is to be filed by 3/4/2024. The deadline for the response is 3/18/2024. The deadline for the reply 3/25/2024. Case is set for a telephonic status hearing on 3/26/2024 at 8:45 a.m. The following call-in number will be used for the hearing: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification #12 is held in abeyance pending the ruling on the motion to compel arbitration. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (mma, )
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Motions by Shannon Liss-Riordan #9 and Matthew Carrieri #11 for leave to appear pro hac vice are granted. (mk)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION by Plaintiffs Mazen Hasan Agha, Michael Crissman, Thomas Loftus, Ken Zurek to certify class (Motion for Conditional Certification and Issuance of Notice Pursuant to 216(b) of the FLSA) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Manewith, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21627574. (Carrieri, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED complaint by Mazen Hasan Agha, Michael Crissman, Ken Zurek, Thomas Loftus against Uber Technologies lnc (Manewith, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21627554. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: At the Court's instance, the telephonic status hearing set for 9:15 AM on 2/12/2024 is advanced to 8:50 AM on that same date, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. (mk)
|
|
Filing 7
STATUS Report (Joint) by Mazen Hasan Agha (Manewith, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time #4 is granted; response to complaint is to be filed by 2/26/2024. This does not affect any other date or deadline set by the Court. (mk)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Uber Technologies lnc by Jennifer L. Schilling (Schilling, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Defendant Uber Technologies lnc for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 /Unopposed (May, Taylor)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Uber Technologies lnc by Taylor M. May (May, Taylor)
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: By no later than 2/5/2024, the parties (or, if no defendant has yet appeared, the plaintiff(s)) are to file a joint status report that includes the following information: (1) the status of service of process upon each defendant; (2) a description of each party's claims and defenses; (3) details regarding any discussions concerning settlement, whether before or after the filing of the lawsuit; (4) a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule; and (5) any other matters that any party wishes to bring to the Court's attention. The case is set for a case management conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 on 2/12/2024 at 9:15 a.m. The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide a copy of this order to any defendant that has not yet appeared by counsel via regular mail at the address at which the defendant has been or is to be served with process. (mk)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Uber Technologies lnc (lm, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Mazen Hasan Agha; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21473679. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Opt-in Form)(Manewith, Bradley)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (mek,)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mek)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
